I know that AMD's chips are in next gen consoles, so you might think they'd perform better out the box, but it really doesn't look like it. The old i7-920 was able to match the FX-8350, while the Phenom II X6 and X4 processors showed their age here." Here the FX-8350 was 31% slower than the Core i7-4770K and 22% slower than its competitor, the Core i5-3470. "With the more playable medium quality settings. "The lower-end Athlon II X4 quad-cores are useless in this game, as are the dual-core parts including the Core i3-3220." The Core i7-3960X was slower than the i5-3570K which is very surprising given how CPU demanding this game is and makes us regret using it as the primary test chip." As we've already seen, the Core i7-4770K is capable of 41fps and the FX-8350 just 37fps, while the Core i7-3770K matched the i7-4770K and the i5-3570K was just 1fps slower. "Now let's see how a range of CPUs handle CoH with the GTX Titan and max quality settings.
"Effectively what this means is that the Core i7-4770K can push the GTX Titan to its limit in CoH 2 at just 2.5GHz while the FX-8350 needs to be clocked 80% higher to achieve the same level of performance."
0 kommentar(er)
